brain wave device
The cell phone and brain cancer
The tumor was on the same side of the head where she held her cell phone and was in the form of cellular phone antenna. Cell phones and brain cancer The case has received media attention General and presented to the Larry King show on CNN.
Although the request was rejected by the court because lack of sufficient evidence, it was a public relations nightmare for the wireless industry. It also marked the beginning of a global research definitive answer to the question: are cell phones safe or not? DOES cause cancer and other degenerative diseases? Brain Cancer is up 25% since cell phones became popular. Each year there are 183,000 more cases in the United States alone. Some health experts say there is a link with cell phone use, but is there proof?
In an effort to diffuse the negative publicity trial large, the cell phone industry itself funded $ 25 million research program dollars to prove that phones Cell phones are safe. After 6 years of intensive research, however, the results were not what they sought. Dr. George Carlo, the chief scientist program, found evidence that cell phones pose some health risks, even cancer.
The first proof of the cancer that rocked the cell phone industry came in 1997. Dr. Michael Repacholi and his colleagues at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia South reported that the long-term exposure to the type of radiation that comes from digital cell phones caused an increase in the frequency lymphoma in mice. The study received widespread attention from international media because it was the first time that cancer has been linked to cell phones in a well conducted study.
THR Red Flags: SOLVING THE PUZZLE OF CANCER
To show a link between cell phone radiation and cancer, let's look at several studies Dr. Carlo investigation makes him a whistle, so to speak. These findings red flag provide parts that are assembled to form the image of cancer:
– The DNA damage in human studies of blood
– Out of the blood-brain barrier
– Studies of Tumors in People Who Use Cell Phones
– Studies of cell phone radiation dose and response
DNA damage in human blood
All tumors and cancers are the result of genetic damage. Most often the damage is including the formation of micronuclei – fragments of chromosomes that form membranes around themselves and appear under a microscope as additional nuclei in the blood cells (which normally have a single nucleus). The relationship between micronuclei and cancer is so strong that doctors around the world to test their presence to identify patients likely to develop cancer. The presence of micronuclei indicates that the cells can not properly repair DNA broken. This deficit is considered an indication of an increased risk of developing cancer.
– In December 1998, Drs. Ray Tice and Graham Hoek Integrated Systems Laboratory in North Carolina showed that blood cells exposed to cell phone radiation suffer damage genetic form of micronuclei. In their studies, DNA and chromosomal damage in blood cells of the white man occurred when is exposed to signals of all types of phones – analog, digital and PC. Damage has been shown even from signals producing at a SAR level below the government "security".
– Using different methods, the above conclusion was confirmed by Dr. Joseph Roti Roti of Washington University in St. Louis in 2000. His research showed that human blood cells exposed to radiation at frequencies of wireless phone did indeed develop genetic damage in the form of micronuclei. This conclusion has received much notice because Dr. Roti Roti is an eminent scientist who works DID underfunding by Motorola Inc.
This has very serious implication. If the radiation cellphones encourages the formation of micronuclei in blood cells and micronuclei are called "biological markers" for cancer, then based on these studies only the use of cell phones could be said to increase the risk of cancer.
DISTRIBUTION IN THE BLOOD Brain Barrier
The blood-brain barrier is a special filter in the blood vessels of the brain that keeps dangerous chemicals from reaching the tissues sensitive brain and cause DNA breakage and other damage.
– In 1994 and again in 2002, Dr. Leif Salford of Lund University of Stockholm, Sweden found in his studies that rats exposed to cell phone radiation showed a breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, as well as areas of shrunken, damaged neurons.
Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here
Studies of micronucleus Tice, Hook and Roti Roti and the blood-brain Salford findings provide an explanation for how two steps of cancer could be caused by radiation from cell phones.
First step: A leak or breakdown in the blood-brain barrier provide a path for the carcinogenic chemicals in the blood (tobacco, pesticides, air pollution, etc.) to infiltrate the brain and damage sensitive brain tissue that would otherwise be protected. These chemicals can break DNA in the brain or cause other damage to achieve these cells.
Second step: If a number of studies have shown that radiation from cell phone itself does not seem to DNA breakage, micronuclei findings suggest that affect the mechanisms of DNA repair in cells brain. Micronuclei result from degradation capacity of the cell to repair itself. When brain cells become unable to repair itself, then carcinogenesis – the creation of tumors – induced by chemical toxins could begin.
DNA carries the genetic material of an organism and its different cells. Any damage that goes unrepaired affects the future generation of cells. The change has procreated and this mutation is considered as a possible cause of cancer.
TUMORS IN PEOPLE WHO USE CELL PHONES
Epidemiological studies, conducted by different investigators using different methods, show evidence of an increased risk of tumors in people who use phones Cell.
– In 1998, Dr. Ken Rothman Eidemiology Resources, Inc., Newton, Massachusetts, conducted a study showing that users of mobile cells have twice the risk of dying from brain cancer than users of the car phone – which antennas are mounted on the body of the car away from the head of the user.
– In 1998, Joshua Muscat, a researcher at the Foundation of Health, showed in his study a doubling of risk of developing neuro-epithelial tumors outside the brain among cell phone users, especially on the side skull where cell phone antennas are held during calls.
– Muscat also showed in another study that people who have used cell phones for six years or more had a 50 percent risk of developing acoustic neuroma, a benign tumor of the nerve hearing controls and extends from the ear to the brain. Acoustic neuromas can cause hearing loss and can be fatal if untreated.
This was confirmed in a separate study in Stockholm, Sweden by Anders Ahlbom in 2004 and sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO), which finds that people who used cell phones, this time for at least 10 years may have an increased risk of developing acoustic neuroma.
– In a study also requested by WHO, researchers led by Dr. Lennart Hardell of Orebro Medical Center in Sweden examined 1617 patients aged between 20 and 80 who had been diagnosed with brain tumors between 1997 and 2000. They were then compared to those healthy. Those who used cell phones for children under 10 years were at risk 20% more likely to develop brain cancer. But for those who have used them for over a decade, the risk was 80% higher. The study also found that tumors were 2.5 times more likely to be on the same side of the head as the phone was held. Cancer of the auditory nerve, acoustic neuroma, showed a larger increase – a risk 3.5 times greater.
Cell Phone Radiation DOSAGE AND RESPONSE
All the studies have shown an increase in cell phone radiation exposure also increases the likelihood of adverse effect occurring.
In Repacholi study of mice, the risk of lymphoma increased significantly as the mice were exposed to radio waves.
In the research of Tice, Hook and Roti Roti, the risks of genetic damage as measured by micronuclei formation increased as the amount of increased radiation.
In epidemoiological three studies – two by Muscat and one by Hardell – the risk of tumors was greater in areas of the brain near place the cell phone was held.
In the study by Salford, the higher the level of radiation exposure rats were exposed more damage was found in blood vessels in the brain and neurons.
THE BIG PICTURE CANCER
The test-tube studies by Tice and Hook, the study mice by Repacholoi and Selford, and epidemiological studies by Rothman, Muscat, and Hardell all agree in that they suggest a increased risk of cancer among cell phone users. They assemble to form the beginnings of an image that everyone can see. They have may not form the complete picture yet, but there are already enough in place to see that there are grounds for serious concern of health Public Safety cellphones.
According to Dr. Carlo, "The Big Picture is disturbingly clear. There is a certain risk that the plume radiation emanating from a cellular phone antenna can cause cancer and other health problems. It is a risk that affects hundreds millions of people worldwide. It is a risk that must be seen and understood by all those who use their cell phones so they can take all appropriate measures are available to protect themselves – and especially to protect young children whose skulls are still growing and who are most vulnerable risks of radiation. "
MORE CUTS TO COME
– In 2000, a team of researchers from Sydney published a scientific hypothesis about the effects of mobile phone radiation causes cancer. The report claims that radiation from cell phones causes stress during to body cells, causing them to generate "heat shock proteins (HSP). Human cells output, sometimes these proteins in response to a injury or infection. Such a chronic activation of the heat shock response affects the normal regulation of cells, which could lead to cancer.
– In 2002, cell biologist Fiorenzo Marinelli and his team at the National Research Council in Bologna, Italy, leukemic cells exposed to radio waves continuous similar to cellular phones. The exposed cells had a higher rate of deaths than the controls at first, but after exposure, a curious thing happened: instead of more cells die, the cells were exposed replicate furiously against the controls. The genes that trigger cells to multiply were turned on in a high proportion of cells. Cancer, although briefly delayed, was become more aggressive. Marinelli suspects the radiation in May initially damage DNA, and that it interferes with the biochemical signals in a way that ultimately triggers the cells to multiply more quickly.
So why CELL PHONES still around?
Now, with all the evidence mounting, the cell phone industry maintains their position that cell phones are safe and have even begun to promote children. Governments were slow to intervene to prevent people from any danger of using cell phones. Fortunately, responsible for Health and experts in several European countries are the first steps, having issued public warnings to parents requesting care about youth and mobile cellular
If the previous environmental issues involving tobacco, asbestos and lead are an indication, it takes years and even decades to accumulate the amount of evidence that would lead to a final decision. In the case of cigarettes, it took two decades reflection and 100 years of consumer use to gather sufficient data to meet research standards to demonstrate the need for the Surgeon General of the United States warning label on cigarette packages. Some experts say that in the case of telephone cell, it will not take as long as the data arrives at a faster pace. But now the authorities can only urge people to exercise caution.
Replication of research is another problem. A study coming out with a new finding has not generally been immediately accepted in the scientific community or the wireless industry unless another research lab has been able to reproduce work and results. The industry has cleverly perpetuated their position by creating an illusion of responsible follow up by always calling for more research.
When Dr. Salford published his study in 2003 showing that neurons in the brain of rats died from exposure to mobile phone radiation, He warned that there may be similar effects in humans over time, could lead to degenerative diseases of the brain. His study has been canceled by the industry as a "novel" finding must be replicated.
But achieving the scientific standard replication can be complicated. Salford says if studies are not absolutely reproduce, providing an apples to apples comparison, there is wiggle Hall to challenge the conclusions follow. Research requires funding and the wireless industry, after the revelations of Mr. Carlo were reluctant to put money into research more complete. As for governments, again many European governments are taking the responsible course through research funding, but the United States and Canada are lagging badly.
In 1999, CNN, Larry King once again featured a man who has made a number million lawsuit against the manufacturers of cellular phones. This time the man, a Maryland neurologist, was himself diagnosed with brain cancer – again located on the side of the head where he held his cell phone. The complaint was rejected once again, however, and the man died shortly after.
According to the WHO report, 0.1 billion people have died from smoking during the 20th century, 10 times Many more will die in the 21st century. Nobody suggests that cell phones could cause many casualties, but we really want to wait to know?
AIMING FOR RESPONSIBLE TECHNOLOGY
Unlike tobacco, the cell phone has become an indispensable part our lives as television and computer. It allowed us to make a giant leap in how we communicate with each other and has been widely credited with saving the lives of people in emergency situations. Cell phones are here to stay, and perhaps rightly so.
The question is not how to prevent people from using this ubiquitous device, but rather how to make it safer. The first step is always to admit that there is a problem, where industry and government to recognize the health risks inherent current technology. This way we can all find the appropriate solutions that we may enjoy the benefits of use without sacrificing our health and our well-being.
treatment of advanced lung cancer Click here
About the Author
lung cancer best treatment Click here
Mind Control Device Demonstration – Tan Le
Do you suffer from anxiety attacks? Of course only a qualified medical professional can correctly diagnose these kinds of serious issues, and I would recommend that you seek assistance in these matters if you're experiencing anxiety symptoms. That being said, there are steps an individual can take to relieve and maybe eliminate the emotional turbulence that often accompanies panic and anxiety attacks. With a very simple, natural technique called brainwave entrainment, you can get these sensations and feelings under control and put your life back in order. Read the rest of this article here: The Best Meditation Product On The Market!